<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tom Watson MP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk</link>
	<description>The inside track since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:56:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hipstamatic takes great pics</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/hipstamatic-takes-great-pics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/hipstamatic-takes-great-pics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hipstamatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west bromwich east]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been testing the new iPhone application, hipstamatic. It takes beautiful, sixties style images.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_4166" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 535px"><a href="http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/hipstamatic.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-4166" title="hipstamatic" src="http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/hipstamatic.jpg" alt="west bromwich hipstamatic" width="525" height="525" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">scene from west bromwich east</p></div>
<p>I&#8217;ve been testing the new iPhone application, hipstamatic. It takes beautiful, sixties style images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/hipstamatic-takes-great-pics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter to the FT (Financial Times) &#8211; Amendment 120A Digital Economy Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/letter-to-the-ft-financial-times-amendment-120a-digital-economy-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/letter-to-the-ft-financial-times-amendment-120a-digital-economy-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#deb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment 120A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Sirs,

We regret that the House of Lords last week adopted amendment 120A to the Digital Economy Bill. This amendment not only significantly changes the injunctions procedure in the UK but will lead to an increase in Internet service providers blocking websites accused of illegally hosting copyrighted material without cases even reaching a judge. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Dear Sirs,</div>
<div></div>
<div>We regret that the House of Lords last week adopted amendment 120A to the Digital Economy Bill. This amendment not only significantly changes the injunctions procedure in the UK but will lead to an increase in Internet service providers blocking websites accused of illegally hosting copyrighted material without cases even reaching a judge. The amendment seeks to address the legitimate concerns of rights-holders but would have unintended consequences which far outweigh any benefits it could bring.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Endorsing a policy that would encourage the blocking of websites by UK broadband providers or other Internet companies is a very serious step for the UK to take. There are myriad legal, technical and practical issues to reconcile before this can be considered a proportionate and necessary public policy option.  In some cases, these may never be reconciled. These issues have not even been considered in this case.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The Lords have been thoughtful in their consideration of the Bill to date.  It is therefore bitterly disappointing that the House has allowed an amendment with obvious shortcomings to proceed without challenging its proponents to consider and address the full consequences.  Put simply, blocking access as envisaged by this clause would both widely disrupt the Internet in the UK and elsewhere, threatening freedom of speech and the open Internet, without reducing copyright infringement as intended. To rush through such a controversial proposal at the tail end of a Parliament, without any kind of consultation with consumers or industry, is very poor law making.</div>
<div></div>
<div>We are particularly concerned that a measure of this kind as a general purpose policy could have an adverse impact on the reputation of the UK as a place to do online business and conflict with the broader objectives of Digital Britain.  This debate has created a tension between specific interest groups and the bigger prize of promoting a policy framework that supports our digital economy and appropriately balances rights and responsibilities.  All parties should take steps to safeguard this prize and place it at the heart of public policy in this area.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Yours sincerely,</div>
<div>Richard Allan, Director of Policy EU, Facebook</div>
<div>Neil Berkett, Chief Executive, Virgin Media</div>
<div>Matt Brittin, Managing Director, Google UK and Ireland</div>
<div>Charles Dunstone, Chairman, Talk Talk Group</div>
<div>Jessica Hendrie-Liaño, Chair, Internet Services Providers Association (ISPA)</div>
<div>Jill Johnstone, International Director, Consumer Focus</div>
<div>Jim Killock, Executive Director, Open Rights Group</div>
<div>Mark Lewis, Managing Director, eBay UK Ltd</div>
<div>Ian Livingstone, Chief Executive, BT Group</div>
<div>Professor Sarah Oates, University of Glasgow</div>
<div>Dr Jenny Pickerill, University of Leicester</div>
<div>Mark Rabe, Managing Director, Yahoo! UK and Ireland</div>
<div>Dr Paul Reilly, University of Leicester</div>
<div>Jess Search, Founder, Shooting People independent film makers</div>
<div>Professor Ian Walden, Queen Mary, University of London</div>
<div>Tom Watson MP</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/letter-to-the-ft-financial-times-amendment-120a-digital-economy-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lord Ashcroft</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/lord-ashcroft-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/lord-ashcroft-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ashcroft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gove]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. I&#8217;ve just seen what Conservative education spokesman Michael Gove said about Lord Ashcroft:
KW:  Joining me now is the shadow schools secretary Michael Gove. Michael Gove I want to read you something: “The party’s unhealthy reliance on Ashcroft puts its entire electoral strategy at risk. Move over Jim Davidson, there’s an even more high-profile comedian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I&#8217;ve just seen what Conservative education spokesman Michael Gove said about Lord Ashcroft:</p>
<p>KW:  Joining me now is the shadow schools secretary Michael Gove. Michael Gove I want to read you something: “The party’s unhealthy reliance on Ashcroft puts its entire electoral strategy at risk. Move over Jim Davidson, there’s an even more high-profile comedian backing the Tories. Let’s give a big welcome to the king of the one-liners, self-made millionaire, self-style [inaudible] Lord, I was just taking the Michael Ashcroft”. Michael Gove you wrote those words in 2000. Do you stand by them now? </p>
<p>MG: I wrote those words when I was a columnist for the Times and I was paid to entertain… </p>
<p>KW:  Were you not paid to tell the truth? </p>
<p>MG:  Well I was paid to entertain and the column was designed to amuse and to provoke. The critical thing is that Lord Ashcroft has I think taken notice of what his critics have said, rather more substantial critics than me…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/lord-ashcroft-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Asian Network and BBC6 Music: Revised Motion</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/bbc-asian-network-and-bbc6-music-revised-motion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/bbc-asian-network-and-bbc6-music-revised-motion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC 6 Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC Asian Network]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That this House notes with deep concern recent newspaper speculation that the BBC is considering closing its 6 Music and Asian Network radio stations; believes that both radio stations offer outlets for independent and non-mainstream music; further notes that both 6 Music and Asian Network reach out to audiences not otherwise well served by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That this House notes with deep concern recent newspaper speculation that the BBC is considering closing its 6 Music and Asian Network radio stations; believes that both radio stations offer outlets for independent and non-mainstream music; further notes that both 6 Music and Asian Network reach out to audiences not otherwise well served by the BBC; congratulates 6 Music and Asian Network for acting as a source of talent for the BBC and other media; recognises that the BBC has a duty to represent and give a platform to minority interests that need a mainstream platform to develop and grow; and calls on the Government to encourage the BBC to continue its support for 6 Music and Asian Network for many years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/bbc-asian-network-and-bbc6-music-revised-motion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lord Ashcroft Statement on tax status</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/lord-ashcroft-statement-on-tax-status/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/lord-ashcroft-statement-on-tax-status/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lord-ashcroft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am making this statement in advance of the release by the Cabinet Office of limited information about the award of my peerage and of the undertakings I gave at the time.
While I value my privacy, I do not want my affairs to distract from the general election campaign. I have therefore decided to release a copy of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am making this statement in advance of the release by the Cabinet Office of limited information about the award of my peerage and of the undertakings I gave at the time.</p>
<p>While I value my privacy, I do not want my affairs to distract from the general election campaign. I have therefore decided to release a copy of the letter which I wrote to William Hague, and to expand on what actually happened.</p>
<p>As the letter shows, the undertakings I gave were confirmed in a memorandum to William Hague dated 23rd March 2000. These were to &#8220;take up permanent residence in the UK again&#8221; by the end of that year. The other commitment in the memorandum was to resign as Belize&#8217;s permanent representative to the UN, which I did a week later.</p>
<p>In subsequent dialogue with the Government, it was officially confirmed that the interpretation in the first undertaking of the words &#8220;permanent residence&#8221; was to be that of &#8220;a long term resident&#8221; of the UK. I agreed to this and finally took up my seat in the House of Lords in October 2000. Throughout the last ten years, I have been declaring all my UK income to HM Revenue.</p>
<p>My precise tax status therefore is that of a “non-dom&#8221;. Two of Labour&#8217;s biggest donors &#8211; Lord Paul (recently made a privy councillor by the Prime Minister) and Sir Ronald Cohen, both long-term residents of the UK, are also &#8220;non-doms&#8221;.</p>
<p>As for the future, while the non-dom status will continue for many people in business or public life, David Cameron has said that anyone sitting in the legislature &#8211; Lords or Commons &#8211; must be treated as resident and domiciled in the UK for tax purposes. I agree with this change and expect to be sitting in the House of Lords for many years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/03/lord-ashcroft-statement-on-tax-status/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tories and Change</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/the-tories-and-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/the-tories-and-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[I started the blog post earlier in the week but didn't get time to finish it. The announcement of the "Vote for Change" message has spurred me on to retrieve it from the bin]
James Forsyth’s fascinating piece about the Tory ‘dead shark’ dilemma confirms to me that what we are witnessing is not, as some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[I started the blog post earlier in the week but didn't get time to finish it. The announcement of the "Vote for Change" message has spurred me on to retrieve it from the bin]</p>
<p>James Forsyth’s fascinating piece about the <a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/spectator/thisweek/5797488/the-tory-situation-is-now-verging-on-critical.thtml">Tory ‘dead shark’ dilemma</a> confirms to me that what we are witnessing is not, as some commentators would have us believe, a natural tightening in the polls before an election.</p>
<p>It’s more significant. It’s the consequence of short-termism, compromise and a failure to embed change in the Conservative Party.</p>
<p>Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Peter Mandelson rediscovered social democracy for Labour. They struggled and won many battles in order to achieve this.</p>
<p>David Cameron has failed to redefine his party. He compromised with his right wing instead of taking them on. The nearer we are to the election, the more it shows.</p>
<p>If you look at the Times today, you can see where <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7040177.ece">Conservative attempts to market the party as new and fresh</a> comes unstuck when you look at the data. One in 16 new Tory candidates are related to past or present Tory MPs! Half of them were recruited from within the party machine, the lobbying industry, The City or the Bar.</p>
<p>Not for the first time in recent months, the media are behind the British Public in their thinking. The Sun front page accusing Gordon Brown of being the “Prime Monster” received almost universal ridicule in the thousands of conversations taking place in the social media space. Sure, the Tories score short-term hits with well-spun news pieces but they’re not telling the whole story. And voters sense this.</p>
<p>The truth is, people know that David Cameron failed to face down the Conservative right. A majority of the electorate may not be enamoured by the European Union but they know that the Tory position is so illogical that they look ridiculous in Germany, France, Spain and Italy.</p>
<p>And more importantly, they know that the Tories were all over the place on the economy. If you need reminding of their inconsistent position, here’s the Sun promoting <a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/1745570/Tories-condemn-nationalisation.html">George Osborne condemning the nationalisation of Bradford and Bingley</a>.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve not changed themselves enough and near an election, people are seeing this. I can&#8217;t find the story from this week that reflected the poll showing that a third of people say that they don&#8217;t know what the Tories stand for but it&#8217;s a dramatic statistic.</p>
<p>So  I think to open up an election with the message &#8220;Vote for Change&#8221; is extraordinarily naive. A third of voters don&#8217;t know what change they&#8217;ll be voting for. Worse, many people still think they offer the wrong kind of change. It&#8217;s a complacent message. It builds on the Tories&#8217; hubristic belief that the election was gifted them last year. It lacks hope and optimism. It&#8217;s devoid of a future offer. They&#8217;ll regret it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/the-tories-and-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tangerinegate</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/tangerinegate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/tangerinegate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert popper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Popper. Genius.
He spoofs Andrew Pierce and then gets written up in a number of national newspapers, including the Sun, which I notice does not appear to support Labour these days.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.robertpopper.com/2010/02/27/gordon-brown-calls-lady-a-citric-idiot/">Robert Popper. Genius.</a></p>
<p>He spoofs Andrew Pierce and then gets written up in a number of national newspapers, including the Sun, which I notice does not appear to support Labour these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/tangerinegate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC 6 Music &#8211; Motion to be tabled</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/bbc-6-music-motion-to-be-tabled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/bbc-6-music-motion-to-be-tabled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6 music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early day motions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;That this House congratulates 6 Music on its diverse and rich mix of music genres, including indie, dance, rock, RnB, soul and reggae; welcomes the station&#8217;s commitment to support new music of unknown, up and coming artists; notes with deep concern recent newspaper speculation that the BBC is considering closing 6 music; and calls on the Government to encourage the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That this House congratulates 6 Music on its diverse and rich mix of music genres, including indie, dance, rock, RnB, soul and reggae; welcomes the station&#8217;s commitment to support new music of unknown, up and coming artists; notes with deep concern recent newspaper speculation that the BBC is considering closing 6 music; and calls on the Government to encourage the BBC to continue its support for thestation for many years to come.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/bbc-6-music-motion-to-be-tabled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Economy Bill &#8211; unprecedented lobbying operation</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/digital-economy-bill-unprecedented-lobbying-operation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/digital-economy-bill-unprecedented-lobbying-operation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#deb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The entertainment industry continues an unprecedented and relentless lobby around the Digital Economy Bill.  The campaigns around this Bill really are a story of David and Goliath.  If you counted the number of people who are working full time to bounce this Bill through the Commons on behalf of big publishing interests I bet it would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entertainment industry continues an unprecedented and relentless lobby around the Digital Economy Bill.  The campaigns around this Bill really are a story of David and Goliath.  If you counted the number of people who are working full time to bounce this Bill through the Commons on behalf of big publishing interests I bet it would run into three figures. Those that want to protect the Internet connections of the nation&#8217;s youth? Probably one or two.</p>
<p>Being lobbied by people you revere, respect and admire is a tricky thing. I&#8217;ve just openend this letter from some big characters in my life. It shows how co-ordinated and determined the entertainment industry is:</p>
<p>Dear Mr Watson<br />
 <br />
The Digital Economy Bill<br />
 <br />
Britain is admired for its creativity and its sense of fair play. British musicians, singers, actors, writers and directors are known and loved around the world and create some of our greatest assets. Together they contribute more that 7% to the UK economy.<br />
 <br />
The Digital Economy Bill brings both of these together. It will ensure that British creators, entertainment companies and the 1.8 millioon people who work in and around the cultural sector are respected and rewarded in the future as they have been in the past., and that they are fairly paid when they put their work online.<br />
 <br />
Digital entertainment services are really beginning to take off: fans have never had so much choice as to how they enjoy their music, books, TV and films online. But for these new business models to develop, it is critical that more is done to prevent the illegal services providing easy access to free content.<br />
 <br />
We urge Parliament to pass this bill as a matter of urgency in order to secure the future of its creative talent and industries.<br />
 <br />
Sir Terry Pratchett OBE author<br />
Simon Cowell<br />
Paul Greengrass President Directors UK<br />
Stephen Garrett Executive Chairman Kudos<br />
Tim Bevan Co Chairman, Working Title Films</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/digital-economy-bill-unprecedented-lobbying-operation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Purnell</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/james-purnell-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/james-purnell-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exits are the hardest thing to get right in politics. James Purnell’s seems sadder than most.
I used to get on well with James. He has a very dry humour that would often help us get through stressful days in the government whips office. Then I resigned in September 2006. Since then we’ve hardly shared a sentence, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exits are the hardest thing to get right in politics. James Purnell’s seems sadder than most.</p>
<p>I used to get on well with James. He has a very dry humour that would often help us get through stressful days in the government whips office. Then I resigned in September 2006. Since then we’ve hardly shared a sentence, let alone a joke.  It’s a situation I regret.</p>
<p>When he resigned last year, I felt great empathy for James.  He wouldn’t have appreciated my thoughts at the time but it’s a very lonely thing when you voluntarily leave government, even when the exit is on good terms.  And James, like me, did not leave on good terms. He would have felt miserable and lonely. In the heat of the media crucible, colleagues use harsh language and say things they shouldn’t. Though you know it’s not really meant, it still hurts.</p>
<p>I felt the same for Siobhain McDonagh when she resigned in turbulent circumstances. Siobhain is Labour. Labour to her very core. You could see the agony on her face when she did TV interviews.</p>
<p>Back to James. He’ll be missed. I’m not surprised to see him depart Westminster whilst he’s still young enough to make a difference in his next endeavour.  I hope he does something dramatic and big in the arts. But whatever he chooses to do, I wish him well. And perhaps one day, we can share wry observations on the absurd aspects of politics and the media again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/02/james-purnell-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
