Response from Solicitors Regulation Authority – Harbottle & Lewis


#1 Tony on 07.22.11 at 5:22 pm

Well done Tom…man of the match so far 😉

#2 Goby on 07.22.11 at 8:31 pm

well done tom on your achievements

#3 Ed Davies on 07.25.11 at 12:16 pm

Keep going Mr Watson brilliant although watch our for smears these characters will try anything

ps I am from Liverpool and lost a student at Hillsborough it is of some comfort that Murdoch’s problems are mounting- I still cannot understand why the BBC invites McKenzie to appear on their programmes, would Richard Dimbley or James Cameron have given him the time of day ?


#4 Neil Brown on 07.29.11 at 6:47 am

During the select committee hearings before the summer recess I was suprised that nobody asked the direct questions:

“Who lodged the file with H&L?”
“Who set their terms of reference for their review ?”
“Who at H&L was responsible for assessing the contents the file and was a peer review of this assessment performed?”.

As an engineer, I would not dream of issuing such a document without several layers of quality assurance and checking of: basis, methodology, uncertainties, conclusions and recommendations.

Lets hope this process will shed some light on the above.

Much respect and admiration for the tenacity and vigor with which you are pursuing this matter.


#5 Simon on 02.16.13 at 11:48 am

I was wondering if the SRA ever got anywhere with this investigation? I was reading a blog about the poor performance of the SRA in that 98% of complaints from the public about solicitors in 2009 didn’t lead to any sanctions. Hopefully you got a better response?

Leave a Comment