Phone hacking enquiry: questions to Colin Myler and Tom Crone

Q1501 Mr Watson: Mr Crone, on the Taylor case, your advice was to settle in April 2008, I think you said?

Mr Crone: I agreed with the outside advice that was given, yes.

Q1502 Mr Watson: So you took it to the Board in June 2008?

Mr Crone: No, I did not take it to the Board; I reported to Mr Myler as editor, and at one stage we both reported it upwards together.

Q1503 Mr Watson: A £700,000 payment would be a decision taken at Board level. Is that right?

Mr Crone: I am not aware of that.

Q1504 Mr Watson: So the News International Board did not agree the payment in any way?

Mr Myler: What do you mean by the “Board”?

Q1505 Mr Watson: Your managing Board; the directors of the company.

Mr Myler: Why would they need to be involved?

Q1506 Mr Watson: Because it is a huge amount of money and they have got a responsibility to the proprietor and shareholder, I assume?

Mr Myler: Yes. As I have said, MrWatson, the sum of money that Mr Taylor first set out to receive was significantly higher than the sum he did receive.

Q1507Mr Watson: I am sorry, I thought that was the easy question. So the Board did not know about the payment—

Mr Crone: I do not know. I am sorry, I do not know. All I do is report to the next stage up.

Q1508 Mr Watson: So you could let us know afterwards; you could write to us and let us know whether the Board took the decision?

Mr Crone: I could ask the question and give you the answer, yes.

Q1509 Mr Watson: Would that be minuted? Could you let us have the Minute?

Mr Crone: If it was raised at the Board I assume it is minuted.

Q1510 Mr Watson: Could you tell us how it would appear in the accounts?

Mr Crone: No, I do not know the answer to that. It would appear against—I probably do know the answer to that. It would appear against the legal department budget.

Q1511 Mr Watson: When did you tell Rupert Murdoch?

Mr Crone: I did not tell Rupert Murdoch.

Mr Myler: The sequence of events, Mr Watson, is very simple, and this is very clear: Mr Crone advised me, as the editor, what the legal advice was and it was to settle. Myself and Mr Crone then went to see James Murdoch and told him where we were with the situation. Mr Crone then continued with our outside lawyers the negotiation with Mr Taylor. Eventually a settlement was agreed. That was it.

Q1512 Mr Watson: So James Murdoch took the ultimate decision?

Mr Myler: James Murdoch was advised of the situation and agreed with our legal advice that we should settle.

Mr Crone: What you have to understand about litigation, which I do not think you do, is that if you are in it then you are in it until it is over.You can stay in it and have a full trial and pay £3 million or you can get out at a certain stage and pay £600,000.

Q1513 Mr Watson: I am just trying to find out who took the decision to make the payment.

Mr Myler: It was an agreed, collective decision. It is how newspapers work. Indeed, Mr Watson, I think you probably know that it is good, sensible, practical business practice across most industries. Are you telling me that you have never come across an agreed payment between two companies or an individual that falls out over something that is done? Is that what you are saying?

Q1514 Mr Watson: No, I amjust trying to find out—

Mr Crone: Mr Watson, because you are on a Conditional Fee Arrangement in your litigation against us—

Q1515 Mr Watson: I do not want to get into that.

Mr Crone:—you have no knowledge of how litigation finances work?

Q1516 Mr Watson: All I am trying to find out is who took the decision to settle—

Mr Myler: Very simple, and I think we have given you the simple answer.

Q1517 Mr Watson: Could I ask about the payments to Mulcaire, just for clarity? You said that he had been working for the paper since the late-1990s.

Mr Myler: I believe that the association may have gone back that far. I think his first contract was, I believe—and, again, perhaps Mr Kuttner—

Mr Crone: The first one I have seen is 2001.

Q1518 Mr Watson: You have seen 2001.Would you be able to let us know if it goes back before that?

Mr Crone: Yes, sure.

Q1519 Mr Watson: I think the only thing in the public domain is that he was paid £100,000 in 2003 to Nine Consultancy. Is that right?

Mr Crone: I do not know.

Q1520 Mr Watson: It could be that he was paid that amount in the years before that.

Mr Crone: It was an annual contract, and the last annual contract was a touch over—it was about £104,000 a year.

Q1521 Mr Watson: That contract ended when he was convicted?

Mr Crone: Yes.

Q1522 Mr Watson: Then you said there was an employment disagreement. He, presumably, thought that because he had worked for you for more than a year he had employment rights and, therefore, you needed to aVord him the same employment just as you gave Clive Goodman. Is that what you understand?

Mr Crone: No, I was not privy; I was not part of that process, but my understanding of the employment law (as I say, I am only repeating what I have been told) is that freelancers or contractors, if they do more than a certain number of hours a week for you, then they have rights.

Q1523 Mr Watson: So when he came out of jail, was his company paid or was he paid directly?

Mr Crone: I do not know.

Q1524 Mr Watson: You could let us know that afterwards. Is that right?

Mr Crone: Yes. I hope someone is writing down what I need to let you know.

Q1525 Mr Watson: And the amount?

Mr Crone: I do not know.

Q1526 Mr Watson: You could confirm that afterwards as well?

Mr Crone: I am sure.

Q1527 Mr Watson: Mr Myler, I was going to say to you that people whose judgment I respect tell me that you are a very decent man and that if there was wrongdoing in the company when you took over you would have cleaned it up. My final question to you, on which I am trying to get light in this Inquiry, is how a newspaper decides what is in the public interest. The judge in the case said that in certain circumstances illegal activity is allowed in the public interest. Am I right to say that under your leadership that public interest test would be taken by you, having sought legal advice, and would not be taken further down the food chain?

Mr Myler: I think it is safe to say, Mr Watson, that in 40 years in this business I spend, probably, equal amounts of time and, depending on the story, more time with lawyers than I do with journalists.

Mr Watson: Thank you.

5 thoughts on “Phone hacking enquiry: questions to Colin Myler and Tom Crone”

  1. My God that reads even worse now than it did at the time. Well done. If Arthur Miller were still alive he could have written a play about this.

  2. Hmm this got me thinking who(single or plural) signed off on the payments to this private eye at the centre of case? Surely even it was the section editor then someone would have to countersign that especially if it was multiple sums of cash, thousands of pounds at a time?

  3. I hope that you and your colleagues won’t let the Met off the hook following Rebekah Brooks’ accidental slip (which Mr Coulson was very quick to field) at the Select Comittee hearing about the practice of making payments to police officers for information received. This seems to me one of the factors at the heart of the Met’s attitude to the Coulson case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *