<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Heritage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/01/digital-heritage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/01/digital-heritage/</link>
	<description>The inside track since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:10:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/01/digital-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-102534</link>
		<dc:creator>MC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4103#comment-102534</guid>
		<description>Mr. Watson, I was well impressed with your speech on your Digital Heritage Bill (despite the protestations of the Speaker ;) I think you&#039;ll find that alot of your views on the internet and its myriad related subjects and issues are much in harmony with the stated goals and aspirations of the Pirate Party. Dont let the name put you off (its the Swedes fault) and i invite you to google us ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Watson, I was well impressed with your speech on your Digital Heritage Bill (despite the protestations of the Speaker <img src='http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I think you&#8217;ll find that alot of your views on the internet and its myriad related subjects and issues are much in harmony with the stated goals and aspirations of the Pirate Party. Dont let the name put you off (its the Swedes fault) and i invite you to google us <img src='http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2010-01-21 &#171; A little Jack with that?</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/01/digital-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-102233</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2010-01-21 &#171; A little Jack with that?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4103#comment-102233</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Heritage &#124; Tom Watson MP Tom Watson (MP West Bromwich East) says: &quot;What is required is a complete rethink on copyright.&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Heritage | Tom Watson MP Tom Watson (MP West Bromwich East) says: &quot;What is required is a complete rethink on copyright.&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Crafti</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/01/digital-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-102189</link>
		<dc:creator>David Crafti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4103#comment-102189</guid>
		<description>Nice speech.

Have you considered embracing the change you have noticed and actually switching to the Pirate Party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice speech.</p>
<p>Have you considered embracing the change you have noticed and actually switching to the Pirate Party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Budden</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/01/digital-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-102186</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Budden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4103#comment-102186</guid>
		<description>It is great that an MP understands and cares about the problem of orphan works. Much of our 20th century heritage is unusable, and, as you say, a significant part is decaying and may be lost forever because it nobody will pay for restoration if the restored work cannot be published.

Unfortunately the Digital Economy Bill does not adequately address the problem. The bill provides for licensing of an orphan work (the approach which has been taken by Canada). This simply doesn&#039;t work: since 1990 the Copyright Board of Canada has granted permission for the use of 237 works, these include “the reproduction of Châtelaine magazine covers in a promotional calendar”, “the reproduction of two nursery rhymes in an educational textbook” and “the reproduction of six images of aliens (source unknown)”. This is hardly unlocking the lost works of Canadian culture. (See  http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/unlocatable-introuvables/licences-e.html )

The trouble with the proposed approach is that it simply does not address the problem. It doesn’t help identify copyright owners. It doesn’t allow mass digitization for indexing purposes. It prejudices the legitimate rights of the copyright holder. It doesn’t address the fact that there are vast quantities of orphaned works.

The bill fails to understand a fundamental point: there is the public interest case for making orphan works more easily accessible and there is the copyright holder’s interest in being reunited with their works, and those two interests are rarely in conflict.

We need to adopt the approach being proposed in the US. There, provided a user makes a documented, good faith, diligent but unsuccessful search for the copyright holder, the user is free to use the work. (Of course the terms ‘diligent’ etc need to be defined, but that is a matter of legal detail.) The user is indemnified against prosecution. If the copyright holder resurfaces then they are entitled to a reasonable compensation for use of their work (again the precise legal meaning of  ’reasonable compensation’ needs to be defined – the US report goes into this in some detail).

Everyone wins. Our cultural heritage is unlocked, and copyright holders can get compensation for their works.

We need a digital archive of our culture that is available to historians, researchers and people who are simply curious. We need a means of republishing orphan works. We need to unlock our lost culture. Let’s not enact legislation that prevents all that.

I have written about this more extensively at:
http://martinbudden.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/digital-britain-report-and-orphan-works/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great that an MP understands and cares about the problem of orphan works. Much of our 20th century heritage is unusable, and, as you say, a significant part is decaying and may be lost forever because it nobody will pay for restoration if the restored work cannot be published.</p>
<p>Unfortunately the Digital Economy Bill does not adequately address the problem. The bill provides for licensing of an orphan work (the approach which has been taken by Canada). This simply doesn&#8217;t work: since 1990 the Copyright Board of Canada has granted permission for the use of 237 works, these include “the reproduction of Châtelaine magazine covers in a promotional calendar”, “the reproduction of two nursery rhymes in an educational textbook” and “the reproduction of six images of aliens (source unknown)”. This is hardly unlocking the lost works of Canadian culture. (See  <a href="http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/unlocatable-introuvables/licences-e.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/unlocatable-introuvables/licences-e.html</a> )</p>
<p>The trouble with the proposed approach is that it simply does not address the problem. It doesn’t help identify copyright owners. It doesn’t allow mass digitization for indexing purposes. It prejudices the legitimate rights of the copyright holder. It doesn’t address the fact that there are vast quantities of orphaned works.</p>
<p>The bill fails to understand a fundamental point: there is the public interest case for making orphan works more easily accessible and there is the copyright holder’s interest in being reunited with their works, and those two interests are rarely in conflict.</p>
<p>We need to adopt the approach being proposed in the US. There, provided a user makes a documented, good faith, diligent but unsuccessful search for the copyright holder, the user is free to use the work. (Of course the terms ‘diligent’ etc need to be defined, but that is a matter of legal detail.) The user is indemnified against prosecution. If the copyright holder resurfaces then they are entitled to a reasonable compensation for use of their work (again the precise legal meaning of  ’reasonable compensation’ needs to be defined – the US report goes into this in some detail).</p>
<p>Everyone wins. Our cultural heritage is unlocked, and copyright holders can get compensation for their works.</p>
<p>We need a digital archive of our culture that is available to historians, researchers and people who are simply curious. We need a means of republishing orphan works. We need to unlock our lost culture. Let’s not enact legislation that prevents all that.</p>
<p>I have written about this more extensively at:<br />
<a href="http://martinbudden.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/digital-britain-report-and-orphan-works/" rel="nofollow">http://martinbudden.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/digital-britain-report-and-orphan-works/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobT</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/01/digital-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-102184</link>
		<dc:creator>RobT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4103#comment-102184</guid>
		<description>Fantastic stuff Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic stuff Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william perrin</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2010/01/digital-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-102170</link>
		<dc:creator>william perrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=4103#comment-102170</guid>
		<description>tom - a side issue but in the same area:  can we also have a national collection of computer games, preferably at the british library.  there is a rich heritage from the 1980s that is in danger of being lost.  i raised this with the BL through their friends network but didn&#039;t get anywhere.

see the collection at http://www.library.illinois.edu/gaming/index.html  for instance


one of the most evocative exhibits in the british library is the collection of original beatles lyrics on random scraps of paper and school exercise books.  at the time this would have been ridiculed by the cultural establishment as a collection of games might be now.

let&#039;s preserve Frak!, Uridium, Head over Heels etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tom &#8211; a side issue but in the same area:  can we also have a national collection of computer games, preferably at the british library.  there is a rich heritage from the 1980s that is in danger of being lost.  i raised this with the BL through their friends network but didn&#8217;t get anywhere.</p>
<p>see the collection at <a href="http://www.library.illinois.edu/gaming/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.library.illinois.edu/gaming/index.html</a>  for instance</p>
<p>one of the most evocative exhibits in the british library is the collection of original beatles lyrics on random scraps of paper and school exercise books.  at the time this would have been ridiculed by the cultural establishment as a collection of games might be now.</p>
<p>let&#8217;s preserve Frak!, Uridium, Head over Heels etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

