<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slugger O&#8217;Toole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/07/slugger-otoole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/07/slugger-otoole/</link>
	<description>The inside track since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:10:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/07/slugger-otoole/comment-page-1/#comment-79269</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3541#comment-79269</guid>
		<description>** and yet they feel you are not a fair person to be on there!

sorry, typo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>** and yet they feel you are not a fair person to be on there!</p>
<p>sorry, typo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/07/slugger-otoole/comment-page-1/#comment-79268</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3541#comment-79268</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom

I found the NOTW’s attempts to oust you from the inquiry board, hilarious, this morning.

There point being, they slandered you ( wanted to include your name, falsely, to try and hype a political situation) in a story, lied, provided false evidence – and yet they feel you are a fair person to be on there!

I wonder how reliable their evidence was then?

I found your inclusion in the whole McBride e-mail thing pathetic. The claims that you were “CC’d” into the e-mails were false, and I do hope that when they inevitabley try to pay you off, to keep it out of court, you don’t sign any confidentialty clauses!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom</p>
<p>I found the NOTW’s attempts to oust you from the inquiry board, hilarious, this morning.</p>
<p>There point being, they slandered you ( wanted to include your name, falsely, to try and hype a political situation) in a story, lied, provided false evidence – and yet they feel you are a fair person to be on there!</p>
<p>I wonder how reliable their evidence was then?</p>
<p>I found your inclusion in the whole McBride e-mail thing pathetic. The claims that you were “CC’d” into the e-mails were false, and I do hope that when they inevitabley try to pay you off, to keep it out of court, you don’t sign any confidentialty clauses!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom watson &#124; Fooner</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/07/slugger-otoole/comment-page-1/#comment-78551</link>
		<dc:creator>tom watson &#124; Fooner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3541#comment-78551</guid>
		<description>[...] Andy Coulson to be referred to Tory ethics committee? &#124; Tom Watson MPStaggering that it took a blog to impart the information that Conservative MPs might be referring Andy Coulson to their ethics committee. A fascinating analysis.Read More [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andy Coulson to be referred to Tory ethics committee? | Tom Watson MPStaggering that it took a blog to impart the information that Conservative MPs might be referring Andy Coulson to their ethics committee. A fascinating analysis.Read More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

