<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Press Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/</link>
	<description>The inside track since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:18:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Graham Brown-Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-74358</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Brown-Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3464#comment-74358</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on this well earned outcome against poor journalism (churnalism).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on this well earned outcome against poor journalism (churnalism).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PB</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-74311</link>
		<dc:creator>PB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3464#comment-74311</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t see anything on Iain Dale&#039;s blog about this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t see anything on Iain Dale&#8217;s blog about this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carter Ruck release: Mail on Sunday apologises to MP over Dale story &#124; DAILYMAIL</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-73970</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter Ruck release: Mail on Sunday apologises to MP over Dale story &#124; DAILYMAIL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 07:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3464#comment-73970</guid>
		<description>[...] Full release at this link&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full release at this link&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePickards &#187; Nadine Dorries: The Witchhunt</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-73928</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePickards &#187; Nadine Dorries: The Witchhunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 23:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3464#comment-73928</guid>
		<description>[...] Only that&#8217;s where it started to unravel slightly. Tom denied it; no-one was able to provide any evidence to the contrary, and eventually&#8230; Associated Newspapers Limited has unreservedly withdrawn the allegations, apologised to Mr Watson for the distress the article caused him and his family and has joined in the reading of the Statement in Open Court today. In addition, Associated Newspapers Limited has agreed to pay Mr Watson substantial damages, together with his legal costs.Tom-Watson.co.uk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Only that&#8217;s where it started to unravel slightly. Tom denied it; no-one was able to provide any evidence to the contrary, and eventually&#8230; Associated Newspapers Limited has unreservedly withdrawn the allegations, apologised to Mr Watson for the distress the article caused him and his family and has joined in the reading of the Statement in Open Court today. In addition, Associated Newspapers Limited has agreed to pay Mr Watson substantial damages, together with his legal costs.Tom-Watson.co.uk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ireland</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-73876</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ireland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3464#comment-73876</guid>
		<description>Iain Dale: “Get your facts right. I apologised directly to Tom on the evening it happened (11 April)”
http://bit.ly/M0uUS

Iain Dale: “Sunny, get your facts right. I did apologise to Tom personally by email on 13 April”
http://bit.ly/XG0lf

Way to get your facts right, Iain.

The fact is, Iain did not publish an apology immediately, it took the involvement of lawyers to get him to even admit to being wrong on his site, and he later implied* that by using lawyers Tom had something to hide.

(*Paul Staines, the most likely source of this false allegation, did the same.)

Also, while Iain may have withdrawn the allegation from his site rather quickly, it made it to print and was widely repeated, and for over two days he allowed the majority of his readers to continue thinking that Tom had been CCed on those emails. By his own admission, he only brought people up to speed if they emailed him and asked about it.

The day this news came out, iain responded to someone asking about this press release by referring them to an earlier statement that *again* without evidence alleged Tom Watson’s direct involvement in the ’smeargate’ emails (and was later forced to delete that comment).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iain Dale: “Get your facts right. I apologised directly to Tom on the evening it happened (11 April)”<br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/M0uUS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/M0uUS</a></p>
<p>Iain Dale: “Sunny, get your facts right. I did apologise to Tom personally by email on 13 April”<br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/XG0lf" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/XG0lf</a></p>
<p>Way to get your facts right, Iain.</p>
<p>The fact is, Iain did not publish an apology immediately, it took the involvement of lawyers to get him to even admit to being wrong on his site, and he later implied* that by using lawyers Tom had something to hide.</p>
<p>(*Paul Staines, the most likely source of this false allegation, did the same.)</p>
<p>Also, while Iain may have withdrawn the allegation from his site rather quickly, it made it to print and was widely repeated, and for over two days he allowed the majority of his readers to continue thinking that Tom had been CCed on those emails. By his own admission, he only brought people up to speed if they emailed him and asked about it.</p>
<p>The day this news came out, iain responded to someone asking about this press release by referring them to an earlier statement that *again* without evidence alleged Tom Watson’s direct involvement in the ’smeargate’ emails (and was later forced to delete that comment).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carter Ruck release: Mail on Sunday apologises to MP over Dale story &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-73868</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter Ruck release: Mail on Sunday apologises to MP over Dale story &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 07:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3464#comment-73868</guid>
		<description>[...] Full release at this link&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full release at this link&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brummytaff</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-73838</link>
		<dc:creator>brummytaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3464#comment-73838</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the letter Tom,
now lets see a robust response to the expenses issues in time for the elections on June 4th. 
Sandwell and West Brom does not need more BNP councillors, specially on the Lyng. So come out fighting!
Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the letter Tom,<br />
now lets see a robust response to the expenses issues in time for the elections on June 4th.<br />
Sandwell and West Brom does not need more BNP councillors, specially on the Lyng. So come out fighting!<br />
Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain Dale is wrong. &#171; A blog from the back room.</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-73829</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Dale is wrong. &#171; A blog from the back room.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3464#comment-73829</guid>
		<description>[...] At the height of the e-mail furore (how long ago it seems&#8230;), Iain libelled Tom Watson in the National press. Iain apologised at the time for that error, but when you allege someone has helped organise a scandalous piece of behaviour you&#8217;re putting their career at risk and you have to accept all the consequences. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At the height of the e-mail furore (how long ago it seems&#8230;), Iain libelled Tom Watson in the National press. Iain apologised at the time for that error, but when you allege someone has helped organise a scandalous piece of behaviour you&#8217;re putting their career at risk and you have to accept all the consequences. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom P</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-73827</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3464#comment-73827</guid>
		<description>actually he&#039;s put a statement up now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually he&#8217;s put a statement up now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2009/05/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-73821</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=3464#comment-73821</guid>
		<description>Apologies Mr Watson, for Harris read Watson in the above post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies Mr Watson, for Harris read Watson in the above post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
