<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neal Lawson&#8217;s August spin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2008/08/neal-lawsons-august-spin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2008/08/neal-lawsons-august-spin/</link>
	<description>The inside track since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:18:02 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evening roundup, 27th August 2008 : Labour Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2008/08/neal-lawsons-august-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-55670</link>
		<dc:creator>Evening roundup, 27th August 2008 : Labour Outlook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=2612#comment-55670</guid>
		<description>[...] Back on home turf, debate abounds about Compass&#8217; Neal Lawson&#8217;s latest attempt to get his mug on the telly. Conor Foley isn&#8217;t persuaded that this is the way forward, nor is Patricia Hewitt, and neither, unsuprisingly, is Tim Worstall. Further to this there are questions being asked about just who are the seven unmamed PPS&#8217; who have apparently signed up to the measure, and whether they actually have. (via). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Back on home turf, debate abounds about Compass&#8217; Neal Lawson&#8217;s latest attempt to get his mug on the telly. Conor Foley isn&#8217;t persuaded that this is the way forward, nor is Patricia Hewitt, and neither, unsuprisingly, is Tim Worstall. Further to this there are questions being asked about just who are the seven unmamed PPS&#8217; who have apparently signed up to the measure, and whether they actually have. (via). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
