Comments on: David Cameron http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2007/02/david-cameron/ The inside track since 2003 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:10:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: David T http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2007/02/david-cameron/comment-page-1/#comment-2242 David T Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:16:29 +0000 http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=925#comment-2242 I remember Osbourne when he was as Magdalen. He was a piss head, not a druggy: and far too public school and uncool to ever have gone to a rave. I remember Osbourne when he was as Magdalen. He was a piss head, not a druggy: and far too public school and uncool to ever have gone to a rave.

]]> By: Ultra http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2007/02/david-cameron/comment-page-1/#comment-2236 Ultra Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:46:34 +0000 http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=925#comment-2236 Tom, There are some in Labour who really ought to be careful when rushing to denounce here. I've some photos of a few aspiring MPs with rather huge pupils at the Reading Festival from my Future Stewarding days, some of whom are on the Amicus list I believe. Tom,

There are some in Labour who really ought to be careful when rushing to denounce here.

I’ve some photos of a few aspiring MPs with rather huge pupils at the Reading Festival from my Future Stewarding days, some of whom are on the Amicus list I believe.

]]> By: Wordblog » Blog Archive » Guido Fawkes turns to law after MP’s post http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2007/02/david-cameron/comment-page-1/#comment-2235 Wordblog » Blog Archive » Guido Fawkes turns to law after MP’s post Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:27:39 +0000 http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=925#comment-2235 [...] 4pm The remainder of this post has been removed. I had been looking at Watson’s blog earlier and jumped to an asumption about the post that Staines was complaining about. Watson mentioned Staines in two posts today. One post has been replaced while the other other remains as written. [...] [...] 4pm The remainder of this post has been removed. I had been looking at Watson’s blog earlier and jumped to an asumption about the post that Staines was complaining about. Watson mentioned Staines in two posts today. One post has been replaced while the other other remains as written. [...]

]]> By: James Jacobs http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2007/02/david-cameron/comment-page-1/#comment-2233 James Jacobs Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:26:55 +0000 http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=925#comment-2233 George Osborne may well have gone to the same raves as Paul Staines, but Osborne probably will say 'I didn't remember it' as a defence- Well, he probably didn't remeber it! George Osborne may well have gone to the same raves as Paul Staines, but Osborne probably will say ‘I didn’t remember it’ as a defence- Well, he probably didn’t remeber it!

]]> By: Ed http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2007/02/david-cameron/comment-page-1/#comment-2223 Ed Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:34:57 +0000 http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=925#comment-2223 I expect lots of people went to said raves. If they hadn't they wouldn't have been raves. Did you go Tom? Or were you a boring git in your youth? I expect lots of people went to said raves. If they hadn’t they wouldn’t have been raves. Did you go Tom? Or were you a boring git in your youth?

]]> By: Tim Ireland http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2007/02/david-cameron/comment-page-1/#comment-2217 Tim Ireland Sun, 11 Feb 2007 02:29:08 +0000 http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=925#comment-2217 Be fair, Tom; it could well be that David Cameron and George Osborne were only guilty of drinking a few innocent glasses of punch: http://ecstasy.org/books/e4x/e4x.ap.03.html PS - If Dave is the big fish, and Paul is the little fish... does that make George a cardboard box? Be fair, Tom; it could well be that David Cameron and George Osborne were only guilty of drinking a few innocent glasses of punch:
http://ecstasy.org/books/e4x/e4x.ap.03.html

PS – If Dave is the big fish, and Paul is the little fish… does that make George a cardboard box?

]]>